Restrictionist Group Ignore Benefits of Immigration and publishes misleading financial portrait of the Dream Act
Invite your friends
Review this article
Facebook sharing options
2759 views , Edition

Restrictionist Group Ignore Benefits of Immigration and publishes misleading financial portrait of the Dream Act

By:
December 1, 2010, 4:41 pm
News
A- A+
Center for Immigration Studies paints misleading financial portrait of the Dream Act
Vote for this article on Facebook

For Immediate Release

 

 

December 1, 2010

Washington D.C. - In a new report, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) paints a misleading financial portrait of the DREAM Act.  The report, entitled Estimating the Impact of the DREAM Act, claims that the bill would be a burden on U.S. taxpayers and would "crowd out" native-born students in the classroom.  However, the available evidence does not support either of these dire predictions.  In fact:

* Institutions of higher education overwhelmingly support the DREAM Act, which would likely increase school revenues as students who would not normally attend college start to pay tuition.

    * The 10 states which, since 2001, have passed laws allowing undocumented students to qualify for in-state tuition have not experienced a large influx of new immigrant students that displaces native-born students.

    * Most DREAM Act students would likely enroll in community colleges, most of which have open enrollment, based on a philosophy that all qualified students should have the opportunity to learn.   Historically, more than 80% of community college students hold full or part-time jobs, thus contributing to their own educations (and the tax base) even as they attend school. The American Association of Community Colleges estimates that state and local governments receive a 16% return on every dollar they invest in community colleges due to the increased earnings of college graduates.

    * Legalizing DREAM Act students would increase beneficiaries' earnings potential, as well as the U.S. tax base.  A 2010 study by the UCLA North American Integration and Development Center estimates that the total earnings of DREAM Act beneficiaries over the course of their working lives would be between $1.4 trillion and $3.6 trillion.

CIS's cynical mischaracterization of the DREAM Act is not only inaccurate, but hypocritical as well.  CIS frequently laments that so many immigrants to the United States have low levels of education, yet opposes a measure that would allow some of these immigrants to become more educated.  What alternative to the DREAM Act does CIS propose?  According to the Center for American Progress the cost to deport more than two million children and young adults who were raised in the United States would be $48.6 billion.  How is that sound fiscal policy?

The U.S. economy doesn't need more deportations; it needs more college graduates.  According to a recent report from the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, "not enough Americans are completing college... by 2018, we will need 22 million new college degrees-but will fall short of that number by at least 3 million postsecondary degrees, Associate's or better." The DREAM Act would help meet this need.

###

For more information contact Wendy Sefsaf at wsefsaf@immcouncil.org or 202-507-7524.

The Immigration Policy Center (IPC), established in 2003, is the policy arm of the American Immigration Council. IPC's mission is to shape a rational national conversation on immigration and immigrant integration. Through its research and analysis, IPC provides policymakers, the media, and the general public with accurate information about the role of immigrants and immigration policy on U.S. society. IPC reports and materials are widely disseminated and relied upon by press and policy makers. IPC staff regularly serves as experts to leaders on Capitol Hill, opinion-makers and the media. IPC is a non-partisan organization that neither supports nor opposes any political party or candidate for office. 


A division of the American Immigration Council.

Visit our website at www.immigrationpolicy.org.

Author: Editorial Staff
Our staff consists of writers living in various parts of the U.S. as well as from Brazil and Portugal. If you would like to become a contributing journalist please send us an e-mail to jornalus@gmail.com.
Sponsors
Apsanlaw Offices

Comments about this article
Your name

Post here your comment

Other news
Showing now
Restrictionist Group Ignore Benefits of Immigration and publishes misleading financial portrait of the Dream Act
Restrictionist Group Ignore Benefits of Immigration and publishes misleading financial portrait of the Dream Act
Wednesday 01 December 2010
Other videos - Dream Act Center for Immigration Studies