Immigration Judges Should Halt Proceedings Against Noncitizens with Serious Mental Disabilities
Invite your friends
Review this article
Facebook sharing options
1978 views , Edition

Immigration Judges Should Halt Proceedings Against Noncitizens with Serious Mental Disabilities

By:
March 17, 2011, 3:11 pm
News
A- A+
Amicus Brief Supporting Termination of Immigration Removal Proceedings
Vote for this article on Facebook

For Immediate Release


March 17, 2011

Washington D.C. - This week, the American Immigration Council's Legal Action Center (LAC) and Texas Appleseed filed an amicus brief with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) supporting Immigration Judges' authority to terminate removal proceedings against noncitizens with serious mental disabilities where a full and fair hearing would be impossible.  Because immigration courts lack many of the due process protections that exist in other areas of our judicial system, more specific safeguards are necessary to protect the most vulnerable populations. 


The LAC and Texas Appleseed filed the brief in the case of B-Z, a longtime legal permanent resident diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, who could not understand the purpose of the proceedings, assist counsel with his defense or present coherent testimony.  The brief argues that immigration courts should adopt standards for evaluating mental competency similar to those employed in federal criminal or civil trials.  Furthermore, Immigration Judges should be permitted to appoint counsel where non-citizens with serious mental disabilities are not competent to proceed on their own.  Additional safeguards, including the appointment of a guardian ad litem, may also be required for noncitizens who are so severely incapacitated that they cannot understand and assist with their hearings even with the assistance of counsel.  Finally, the brief contends that termination is proper where no conceivable set of safeguards would enable the respondent to participate meaningfully in proceedings and the record supports some inference of eligibility for relief.

"Given the high stakes and complex issues involved in removal proceedings, Immigration Judges must be allowed to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that no one is wrongfully deported," said Melissa Crow, Director of the Legal Action Center.

B-Z is represented by Rachel Kling of the Florence Project in Arizona. Texas Appleseed was represented by attorneys at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, in Washington, D.C.  Human Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights also filed amicus briefs in this case.

###
For press inquiries, contact Wendy Sefsaf at 202-507-7524 or wsefsaf@immcouncil.org

ABOUT US

The Legal Action Center strives to increase the accountability of government agencies that administer the immigration laws and to ensure these laws are interpreted and implemented in a way that honors fundamental constitutional and human rights. The LAC engages in impact litigation, including appearing as amicus curiae (friend of the court) before administrative tribunals and federal courts in significant immigration cases on targeted legal issues, and has long worked to protect the right to counsel for noncitizens facing removal from the United States.

Author: Editorial Staff
Our staff consists of writers living in various parts of the U.S. as well as from Brazil and Portugal. If you would like to become a contributing journalist please send us an e-mail to jornalus@gmail.com.
Sponsors
Apsanlaw Offices
Other news
Showing now
Immigration Judges Should Halt Proceedings Against Noncitizens with Serious Mental Disabilities
Immigration Judges Should Halt Proceedings Against Noncitizens with Serious Mental Disabilities
Thursday 17 March 2011
Immigration News
Supreme Court Decision would affect millions here illegally
Source: Moises Apsan
Thursday 14 April 2016
immigration news
Supreme Court Decision would affect millions here illegally
Thursday 14 April 2016
News
Trump is destroying the Republican Party!
Source: Moises Apsan
Monday 21 September 2015