Amicus Brief to Strike Down Regulation Barring Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen
Invite your friends
Review this article
Facebook sharing options
2232 views , Edition

Amicus Brief to Strike Down Regulation Barring Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen

By:
March 13, 2011, 12:27 pm
News
A- A+
Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen
Vote for this article on Facebook
Amicus Brief to Strike Down Regulation Barring Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen

For Immediate Release



March 13, 2011

Washington D.C. - This week, the American Immigration Council's Legal Action Center, joined by the American Immigration Lawyers Association, submitted an amicus brief to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Contreras-Bocanegra v. Holder, urging the court to strike down the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) regulation barring review of motions to reopen filed by noncitizens outside the United States.The Legal Action Center and the National Immigration Project have coordinated litigation on this issue nationwide and call on the BIA to abandon its misguided regulation.

Federal law gives noncitizens the right to file motions to submit new evidence after their removal orders become final. For many years, the BIA has wrongly determined that it cannot consider such a motion if a foreign national is outside the United States. This policy gives the government a perverse incentive to remove noncitizens from the country before they have an opportunity to submit evidence that could change the outcome of their cases. Moreover, the policy is at odds with provisions of a harsh 1996 immigration law that resulted in a dramatic reduction in due process rights and expansion of expedited removal but that made it clear that noncitizens had the opportunity to seek review of unfavorable decisions from outside the United States.

In the past two months, the Second and Sixth Circuits have joined the growing list of courts to hold that the BIA has authority to consider a motion to reopen from a noncitizen who has left the U.S.  The Tenth Circuit, however, is out of line with the five other circuits to consider this issue, having upheld the departure bar in a 2009 decision.  The Legal Action Center's amicus brief calls on the Tenth Circuit to reconsider its prior case law and grant en banc (full court) review of the case.  The Petitioner is represented by Christopher Keen and Edward Carter of Keen Law Offices, LLC.  The National Immigration Project, joined by Boston College's Post-Deportation Human Rights Project, and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network also submitted an amicus brief in support of en banc review.

###

For more information contact Beth Werlin at bwerlin@immcouncil.org.

ABOUT US

The Legal Action Center strives to increase the accountability of government agencies that administer the immigration laws and to ensure these laws are interpreted and implemented in a way that honors fundamental constitutional and human rights. The LAC engages in impact litigation, appears as amicus curiae (friend of the court) before administrative tribunals and federal courts in significant immigration cases on targeted legal issues, and has long worked to protect the right to counsel for noncitizens facing removal from the United States.

Author: Editorial Staff
Our staff consists of writers living in various parts of the U.S. as well as from Brazil and Portugal. If you would like to become a contributing journalist please send us an e-mail to jornalus@gmail.com.
Sponsors
Apsanlaw Offices
Other news
Showing now
Amicus Brief to Strike Down Regulation Barring Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen
Amicus Brief to Strike Down Regulation Barring Immigration Post-Departure Motions to Reopen
Sunday 13 March 2011
Immigration News
Supreme Court Decision would affect millions here illegally
Source: Moises Apsan
Thursday 14 April 2016
Events
Zeca Pagodinho live in New York October 2015
Source: Joao Vianna
Thursday 10 September 2015