Circuit Court Rules USCIS Unlawfully Imposed Arbitrary Requirements
Invite your friends
Review this article
Facebook sharing options
3588 views , Edition

Circuit Court Rules USCIS Unlawfully Imposed Arbitrary Requirements

By:
March 4, 2010, 6:57 pm
News
A- A+
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Adopts Legal Action Center's Arguments
Vote for this article on Facebook

Washington D.C. - In a decision issued today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the arguments of the Legal Action Center (LAC), of the American Immigration Council, that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) unlawfully imposed extra-regulatory requirements on a petition for a worker of "extraordinary ability" (EB-1). The case in question, Kazarian v. USCIS, involves a theoretical physicist whose employment-based visa was denied because he did not demonstrate "the research community's reactions to his [scholarly] publications" - an arbitrary requirement with no justification in the law.
 
In today's decision, the Ninth Circuit amended its previous ruling and reversed the agency's interpretation. The court held that "neither USCIS nor an [Administrative Appeals Office] may unilaterally impose novel substantive or evidentiary requirements beyond those set forth [in the regulations]."  The Ninth Circuit also found that the agency impermissibly added another unlawful criteria as well.
 
The case stems from a 2009 Ninth Circuit Court ruling in favor of USCIS. Following that ruling, the LAC and NAFSA submitted an amicus brief in support of rehearing Kazarian's case. The LAC argued that USCIS erred by adding an additional requirement that did not exist under the law. Kazarian was represented pro bono in the rehearing petition by Wolfsdorf Immigration Law Group.
 
Today's decision sends a clear message that USCIS must follow the law and provide a fair process. Unfortunately, this case is not an isolated incident and not the first time the LAC has successfully challenged the policies and practices of the agency. The LAC will continue to challenge similar attempts by the government to operate outside of the law.
 
"Immigration law is complicated enough without the immigration agency imposing additional requirements and burdens of proof that aren't in the statute or regulations and that ultimately undermine the goal of attracting the best and brightest to our shores," said Benjamin Johnson, Executive Director of the American Immigration Council.

To read the decision in its entirety visit:
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/03/04/07-56774.pdf

For more information contact Wendy Sefsaf at 202-507-7511 or wsefsaf@immcouncil.org

Author: Arthur Lewis
Arthur Lewis is a independent journalist who has written for periodicals in the U.S., Canada, England and Australia. His interests are varied and he is currently "following the waves" in Hawaii.
Sponsors
Other news
Showing now
Circuit Court Rules USCIS Unlawfully Imposed Arbitrary Requirements
Circuit Court Rules USCIS Unlawfully Imposed Arbitrary Requirements
Source: Arthur Lewis
Thursday 04 March 2010
Immigration News
Supreme Court Decision would affect millions here illegally
Source: Moises Apsan
Thursday 14 April 2016
immigration news
Supreme Court Decision would affect millions here illegally
Thursday 14 April 2016